College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

America wants to see more change

Contributing Writer

Published: Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 14:02

If a head football coach does not take his team to the championship in two years, rumblings abound for his termination. We will sit in the drive-thru for ten minutes at McDonald’s while the lobby is empty.

Needless to say, we as Americans have become spoiled and impatient. Unfortunately, this way of thinking has translated to how people view the president.

In a little over a year, President Obama has fallen short on his ambitious agenda, and people are freaking out like that kid in the YouTube video “greatest freak-out ever” when his microwave turkey dinner doesn’t heat fast enough for him.

Some progressives are freaking out because Obama is not the magic bullet cure-all they unfairly expected. Repub-licans are freaking out because they lost and, like Rush Limbaugh, are hoping the president fails.

The truth is, most presidents don’t accomplish all the big things they promise in their first year in, and Obama has only just entered the second year of his term. When Obama entered office, he knew about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, America’s dwindling role in the global economy and a failing health care system, but he could not have foreseen the crushing recession, major auto companies going under and unemployment skyrocketing into the double-digits.

Of course, opposing politicians believe they could handle all that with ease. Just drill, baby, drill, and have more tax cuts — get real, people.

And remember, when conservatives were afraid of what a liberal like Obama would do with all that power as his party had control over both the Senate and Congress? Well I guess all that fear was for naught because Obama has not received that majority support for his major agendas.

That’s hard to understand because three years ago, when the then-junior senator decided to run for president, he gave a speech that outlined how he planned to change America by reducing partisanship, rebuilding America’s world image (through actions like closing Gitmo) and achieving universal health care.

Democrats were practically high-fiving and slapping him on the back. However, it seems that when Obama pushed on with his agenda, certain Democrats said to themselves, “Oh, he was for real about all that stuff!”

Obama hasn’t received the support he needs from either party. That is one of the differences between his administrations and the previous.

Because of 9/11, Americans made the decision to come together as a nation and support our president. Bush was practically given a blank check as to how he wanted to run the country. This support also led to Bush’s high approval rating, while Repub-licans love to point out the low ratings for Obama — even though Reagan’s approval rating was just as low at this same time in his term.

So before we freak out more, let’s read what Obama said in his 2007 announcement speech: “What’s stopped us is the failure of leadership, the smallness of our politics — the ease with which we’re distracted by the petty and trivial, our chronic avoidance of tough decisions, our preference for scoring cheap political points instead of rolling up our sleeves and building a working consensus to tackle big problems.”

Doesn’t sound like much has changed since then. So instead of being impatient and spoiled about the change Obama has promised, maybe we should make a change in ourselves.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

2 comments

Anonymous
Mon Apr 19 2010 21:23
"The truth is, most presidents don’t accomplish all the big things they promise in their first year in, and Obama has only just entered the second year of his term. When Obama entered office, he knew about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, America’s dwindling role in the global economy and a failing health care system, but he could not have foreseen the crushing recession, major auto companies going under and unemployment skyrocketing into the double-digits." Ridiculous... give us some example of "how most presidents don't accomplish all the big things" in their first year, instead of some broad speculative platitude to excuse the performance of a current president. Obama did foresee the crushing recession... he sat with Bush as well as McCain and Harry Reid to push a useless bailout which plunged us further into a recession. You don't remember? He was campaigning for president at the time. Unemployment? Really? He and his administration promised the American people that if Congress passes yet another useless bailout, employment would never go above 8% let alone double digits."Of course, opposing politicians believe they could handle all that with ease. Just drill, baby, drill, and have more tax cuts — get real, people."So... again... what is your solution? So we don't drill, but continue to buy oil from overseas and spend millions more during a time when we cannot spend to RESEARCH "alternative energy sources." I guess this means that we should increase taxes on everyone, just don't touch the 49% of Americans who don't pay taxes, that's your constituency."Well I guess all that fear was for naught because Obama has not received that majority support for his major agendas."The majority support against Obama is a result of the fear you are talking about. Democrats won't touch his radical agendas because they know they will not be re-elected. Check Rasmussen bro, they are in bad shape for supporting the health care agenda."Obama hasn’t received the support he needs from either party. That is one of the differences between his administrations and the previous."WRONG! Badly wrong. Bush received plenty of support from both parties. The main agenda being "The No Child Left Behind Act." An atrocious bill written by the liberal lion himself, Ted Kennedy, which was passed with bi-partisan support.“What’s stopped us is the failure of leadership, the smallness of our politics — the ease with which we’re distracted by the petty and trivial, our chronic avoidance of tough decisions, our preference for scoring cheap political points instead of rolling up our sleeves and building a working consensus to tackle big problems.”LMAO... again and again. Do you know why I'm laughing? Because you haven't figured it out yet! Every president before Obama has made stylized statements like this, and they make them because they are so general in nature and lack substance that its impossible for anyone to disagree. I'm still giggling... this is hilarious."So instead of being impatient and spoiled about the change Obama has promised, maybe we should make a change in ourselves."Why? Was it the American people who got us into this mess? NO! It was the government. Bush, McCain, Obama, Pelosi, Reid... they're all guilty of the reckless and irresponsible spending of taxpayer dollars. It doesn't matter which side your on, the government needs to change, and how can they do this? STOP SPENDING OUR MONEY!!!!!! I understand that this is an opinion but there is not one cited fact or even an example... at least an anecdote to even up hold anything you've said here. Well, oh yeah, there is this: "If a head football coach does not take his team to the championship in two years, rumblings abound for his termination. We will sit in the drive-thru for ten minutes at McDonald’s while the lobby is empty." This is just stupid, pure and simple. There is not much difference between 10 minutes of waiting in line at the drive thru and 5 minutes waiting in line in the "lobby" (there's a lobby in McDonald's?), but there is a huge difference between 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and two years... so your so-called perfect analogy actually makes no sense. There is no consistency here, just generalizations like "some progressives" but suddenly you become specific by simply stating "Republicans." Progressives are individuals of an ideology, and Republicans are members of a political party.You go from "some progressives" to "Republicans" to "most presidents" to "opposing politicians" to "conservatives" then it is suddenly "Democrats" like you are talking about ALL of them, then we go back to "Americans" and those "Republicans," you talk about Bush and 9/11 but point out Reagan when comparing him to Obama... in the same paragraph!!!! Then you end the article with... "ourselves." Let me ask you... WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? This is most definitely one of the worst constructed criticisms of political parties, ideologies, "people," and...
Anonymous
Wed Feb 17 2010 14:48
Amen!!! And people also need to realize that the colossal mess Obama inherited is not something that is going to be fixed overnight!






log out