College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Guns, Cowboys and Lattes

Contributing Writer

Published: Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 15:03

American Old West, circa 1910. A burly man walks into the local watering hole with his .357 Magnum on his hip and orders a whiskey drink. Now fast forward to American West 2010 as a burly man walks into a modern day drinking establishment with his .357 strapped to his hip and orders – a vente soy iced white mocha, no whip cream.

That’s the scene now at Starbucks now as they allow patrons to openly carry guns inside the store.

For what reasons gun carriers feel the need to bring guns into a place frequented by hipsters and guys writing screenplays on their laptops completely eludes me. And though the guns are not allowed to be loaded, gun rights advocates say they are making a statement by carrying the guns.

What happened to just wearing a T-shirt to make a statement?

This “guns and coffee” issue is the culmination of America’s rise in gun culture which was already huge. And gun aficionados seemed to be trying to bring back the Wild, Wild West.

Case in point in late February of this year in North Pensacola, Douglas Weinberg was awakened by his wife saying she observed someone inside the back yard creeping along the fence.

Reportedly there were some burglaries in the neighborhood, so instead of Weinberg doing the proper thing and calling the police, he armed himself with his black semi-automatic handgun and exited his residence cowboy style to see a white-colored vehicle exit a side street one house from his.

His neighbor, Jerry Stefani, stepped outside too with his revolver in hand, and they both began yelling at the three occupants in the vehicle as they entered Stefani’s truck to pursue the vehicle.

The white car got stuck in the mud and the occupants began to run, all the while they were being shot at by Weinberg and Stefani.

Turns out the three occupants of the white vehicle were actually delivering newspapers for the Pensacola News Journal. They only fled because they observed that the two homeowners were armed with guns and believed they were about to become the victims of a robbery.

Because of this cowboy mentality, three innocent men could have been harmed. The sudden rise in gun advocacy came when it seemed eminent that Barack Obama would become president.

Guns and ammo were flying off the shelves as people feared that “Obama’s gonna take our guns away.” This hasn’t been the case. Obama and his top allies have largely been silent on issues such as reviving an assault weapons ban or strengthening background checks at gun shows.

In fact, before being elected, Obama supported the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban. And Obama signed the legislation as part of a broader bill, that allows licensed gun owners to bring firearms into national parks. So where exactly is this fear coming from?

Hint – his name starts with an “L” and ends with an “imbaugh”.

Some perspective for the president Washington, D.C at one time was the murder capital of the world with such gun violence that the city banned hand guns and the NBA team, the Washington “Bullets,” changed its name to the innocent sounding “Wizards.” So before we yell, “Regulators. Mount up,” let us remember that a false sense of fear and more guns will not make us safer.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

R. Ames
Tue Apr 6 2010 18:21
The .357 Magnum wasn't developed until the 1930s. In the late pre-war period, the revolver would've been a .44 Special or .45 Colt.

Also, in many localities, open carry was prohibited by the local sheriff. Since they could no longer carry a gun openly, criminals simply concealed a smaller gun. Prohibiting an action does nothing to stop criminals-- it only stops those who follow the law. Ever notice that a remarkable number of shootings happen in "gun free zones?"

Proud Gun Owner
Sat Mar 20 2010 16:08
It's morons like Freedom Whiting that would love nothing more than to take someones right away and tell them that they know best. It's people like this that gives me reasons to exercise my right to own, carry and purchase guns...plain and simple. Move on you Statist...your kind is of no use to the rest of the world.
Rob Rowlison usmc vet
Thu Mar 18 2010 02:02
Well ,when the guns are the last defence against a socity that has stopped being loyal to the USA I will no longer have the use for one. The kids are no longer able to say the 'Pledge of Alligance ' ,Pray to God in school as not to offend some one in the class. Well if being armed offends you please feel free to attempt to disarm me your self . Dial 911 first and wait to press send as you make your best effort.
I have seen the USA change over the past 40 years into some thing I don't understand. The rules have eroded into sinful self absorbed indulgance . Just what is it you want ? The good Lord will judge us all in the end so resist as long as you feel you can but the day will come you will have to answere for your actions befor God ,weather you believe in him or not.
The founding fathers had a vision with God as the center of the whole thing . That's what the problem is for this country , that God you cannot remove . As you attempt to remove his name from the schools , court rooms , ect. your efforts are becomming clear to me your feeling a guilt and pain you can't quell . Sad story isn't it ? So in closing do you still want to attempt removing my weapon and meet the big boss himself ahead of schedual?
Rob Rowlison
Mr. Common Sense
Thu Mar 18 2010 01:05
Freedom Writing, allow me to educate you about those people who like to carry weapons. The right to carry a weapon involves the following: to protect life, to protect the life of the innocent, and to prevent rape.

However, I will indulge you. Let's say that Starbucks bans firearms in their store, concealed or open-carry. This ban would only affect law-abiding citizens. For some strange reason, criminals still defy such bans. As a result, we unarm the good guys while the bad guys are stil armed.

As for your example of Douglas Weinburg, how does that apply to people who like to carry their guns. Douglas Weinburg broke the law. Douglas had a right not to retreat under Florida's Castle Doctrine, but he didn't have a need to retreat. Instead, he got into his truck and unlawfully pursued. Weinburg's illegal actions does not correlate with a law-abiding citizen's right to bear arms. Freedom Writing, where do you draw the connection between the two?

In Weinburg's case, he should have called the police. However, calling the police is not always the fail-proof way to resolve an emergency. Police cannot be everywhere at once--even they will tell you that. Don't believe me---then go ask them yourself. Their response time often allows a criminal to commit the deed and leave. Police usually show up to a crime scene in time to place caution tape and investigate. If the criminal's intention is murder or rape, then I don't blame a gun owner for reaching for the gun instead of the phone. I don't think there are many criminals who will wait for you to dial 911, then wait for the cops to show up.

And Freedom Writing, did you even look up Obama's voting record extensively? Apparently not. Obama has opposed several bills regarding guns from 1996 onward. Although he has been singing a different tune since he became a presidential canditate, his voting history is still there. Are some people scared of Obama's previous takes on gun ownership? Of course, but gun manufacturers aren't complaining.

Gun owners aren't making a statement. They have a right to bear arms. Gun owners become an effective militia in case the need ever arises. Should the government become one of tyranny, then the gun-owning population is not entirely defenseless. A gun allows a 100 lbs. girl to defend herself against a 200 lbs. man attacking her. When law-abiding citizens are armed, criminals tend to have a more difficult robbing them.

From reading your previous articles, Freedom Writing, you have a lot to learn. Your research is shaky at the very best. I've noticed that a lot of material you write about comes from Wikipedia. You overgeneralize groups of people, such as grouping gun owners with Limbaugh's conservative propaganda.

I consider myself split between many conservative and liberal ideals. However, I find that your writing (yes, I'm talking about you, Freedom Writing) only offers the reader unpracticed theories and speculations with little facts or logic. Not only that, you insult conservatives. If you want to preach your agenda, a condescending approach never works.

3fgburner
Wed Mar 17 2010 15:04
Let's see... First off -- people have been carrying guns in Starbucks all over the country outside of California, for years. The open carriers in CA are trying to make a point that unless you're rich or politically well-connected, you can't carry concealed.

Obama is on record as having favored gun bans. On his campaign / transition website, change.gov, he and Biden said they favored reinstituting the "assault weapon" ban. That ban also appears in the Democratic Party platform. Just because he's realized that gun control is a losing issue, does NOT mean that Obama has Seen The Light(tm) and become pro-gun. I heard him say that he "won't take away your hunting rifles, or your handguns". The implication was, "If I kiss up to the Elmer Fudds and don't threaten their walnut-stocked Bambi-zappers, they'll vote for me and throw the black-rifle people under the bus".

I'll trust him after he either vetoes a gun ban, or signs some radically pro-gun legislation that's not attached to a must-pass item on his social-policy agenda.

Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 10:06
http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Suspect-arrested-in-string-of-coffee-shop-robberies-87740847.html






log out